Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP) successfully assisted PPC Group, one of the largest investors in the Romanian energy sector, in the collective bargaining process conducted to conclude new collective bargaining agreements for the group’s largest entities, i.e., Rețele Electrice România, PPC Energie, PPC Renewables and PPC România.
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP) was part of the international legal team advising the Spanish Saica Group, one of the largest European players in the development and production of recycled paper and packaging, on the acquisition of the German Thimm Group, a leading provider of sustainable corrugated packaging and display solutions.
NNDKP has been shortlisted for the Life Sciences EMEA Awards 2026, in the Romania Firm of the Year awards category.
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP) has once again been recognized as one of the leading law firms in Romania, securing top-tier positions in the legal rankings recently released by Chambers Europe.
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP) has been shortlisted for the Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 by Managing IP, in all award categories for Romania, namely:
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP) has once again earned a spot on the shortlist for the prestigious Romania Law Firm of the Year award, presented by Chambers Europe.
NNDKP advised Holcim Romania on the acquisition of Uranus Pluton SRL, a granite quarry operator active since 2004 in Tulcea county.
The High Court of Cassation and Justice has recently upheld a decision of the Timisoara Court of Appeal, with significant relevance for transfer pricing disputes based on the re-qualification of the functional profile of a company within a multinational group from independent producer to producer under the full control of the group. It has been confirmed that elements specific to the operation of a multinational group, such as providing support services by global cooperation structures or the existence of common directors, do not prove the existence of a transaction between the parent company and the controlled entity that would justify reconsidering the functional profile of the company, even in cases where the controlled entity experienced periods of losses.
